Evolution of unscheduled flows in continental Europe: their lasting negative impact on electricity cross-border capacity

Image
Unscheduled electricity flows, evolution
Intro News
Early conclusions of the upcoming ACER Market Monitoring Report confirm that while the electricity wholesale markets continue to integrate across the EU, some significant challenges remain.

Evolution of unscheduled flows in continental Europe: their lasting negative impact on electricity cross-border capacity

What is it about?

The latest version of the ACER market monitoring report states that while the electricity wholesale markets continue to integrate across the EU, some significant challenges remain. The upcoming edition of the report will confirm that observation. In particular, the available cross border capacity remains insufficient, and this is partly due to important levels of unscheduled flows (UFs).

What are the unscheduled flows? Why are they relevant?

Discrepancies exist between the physical paths followed by power flows at a given moment in time and the paths anticipated from transactions triggering such flows. These discrepancies take the form of various “distortive” flows in the system, called unscheduled flows.

Transmission System Operators (TSOs) must anticipate the impact of unscheduled flows to ensure the integrity of the system. In doing so, they reduce the amount of capacity available for trade by the amount necessary to cope with unscheduled flows. As a consequence, unscheduled flows cause social welfare losses and hamper market integration.

What is ACER’s position?

ACER believes that improving the capacity calculation methodologies and the bidding zone configurations will mitigate the impact of unscheduled flows in the short term. In the longer term, loop flows will be alleviated by investments in the transmission network.

ACER has been monitoring the evolution of unscheduled flows in Europe since 2012. Specifically, ACER monitors unscheduled flows as the sum of unscheduled allocated flows and loop flows. Unscheduled allocated flows stem from insufficient coordination in capacity calculation and allocation processes. Loop flows within a bidding zone result from electricity exchanges inside other bidding zones [1].

What are the main findings?

In 2020, total unscheduled flows amounted to 111 TWh, which represents an overall increase of 2% compared to 2019. In particular, in the Core (excluding CWE) [2] region, unscheduled flows increased by almost 8% compared to 2019. Overall, this region had the larger share of UFs, more than 46% of all UFs in Europe. In the Core (CWE) region, unscheduled flows decreased by more than 5% year-on-year.

Main average oriented unscheduled flows in Continental Europe - 2015 to 2020
Unscheduled flows, Core region
Source: ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data. 
Note: The arrow is red when unscheduled flows are in the same direction as the physical flow, and yellow when they are opposite to physical flows. The width of the arrows is proportionate to the flows. For each year, the specific value of each flow in MW is detailed in the corresponding MMR edition.

The animation shows the prevailing direction of unscheduled flows from 2015 to 2020. An overall pattern through the years consists of two major loops, from Germany to Switzerland to the south west, and to Poland to the east.

Another significant pattern can be observed from the north to the south of Germany, via the Netherlands, Belgium and France. The animation shows that this pattern changed over the last two years. In particular, since 2019, the overall shift from coal to gas led to reduce the amount of electricity imported from Germany to the Netherlands while the amount of electricity exports from the Netherlands increased. This caused the level of unscheduled flows to decrease in the area.

For a complete analysis of the evolution of unscheduled flows in 2020, consult our publication.

The next edition of the ACER Market Monitoring Report (2020) will be published in November 2021.

[1] The definitions of the flows and the methodology for the calculations underpinning results in this Annex are provided in the methodological paper on UFs.
[2] The Core region involves 13 Member States of Central Europe; CWE stands for Central-West Europe.

Evolution of unscheduled flows in continental Europe: their lasting negative impact on electricity cross-border capacity

Access the complete analysis:

ACER consults on the long-term cross-border capacity calculation methodology for the Core region, comprised of 13 EU states

Image
acer image
Intro News
The National Regulatory Authorities of the Core region asked the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to decide on the long-term capacity calculation methodology (LT CCM) for the region.

ACER consults on the long-term cross-border capacity calculation methodology for the Core region, comprised of 13 EU states

What is it about?

The National Regulatory Authorities of the Core region asked the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to decide on the long-term capacity calculation methodology (LT CCM) for the region.

To take an informed decision, ACER is inviting all interested parties to submit their comments by 31 July 2021.​

The Core region comprises of 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Croatia, France, Germany, Hungary, Luxemburg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.

Find out more about the Public Consultation.

What are the benefits?

Long‐term cross border capacity calculation promotes effective long‐term cross‐zonal trade. By calculating reliable capacities and making them available to market participants at an early stage, long-term capacity calculation allows for long‐term planning and provides hedging opportunities.

The long-term capacity calculation methodology for the Core region shall cover yearly and monthly capacity calculation processes, by applying the flow-based approach.

How does ACER contribute?

ACER’s decision will contribute to the effectiveness and integration of the Core electricity markets by establishing the common rules for calculating the long-term cross-zonal capacity at regional level.

Among the next steps:

ACER expects to reach its decision by 3rd November 2021.

Would you like to learn more about the topic? Join the ACER public workshop on 9th July (10:00 – 11:15 am).

ACER to decide on harmonised allocation rules for long-term transmission rights

Image
acer image
Intro News
ACER has received on 25 June 2021 all transmission system operators’ proposal to amend the harmonised allocation rules for long-term transmission rights.

ACER to decide on harmonised allocation rules for long-term transmission rights

What is it about?

The EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has received on 25th June 2021 transmission system operators' (TSOs) proposal to amend the harmonised allocation rules for long-term transmission rights.

ACER will reach a decision on the proposal by 22 December 2021.

To take an informed decision, ACER will collect inputs during the course of the decision making process by consulting with market participants, TSOs and regulatory authorities.

ACER will run a six-week public consultation, from 19 July to 30 August 2021.

What are the benefits of having harmonised allocation rules across Europe?

The harmonised allocation rules ensure a transparent and non-discriminatory capacity allocation of long-term transmission rights to all market participants by, among the others:

  • harmonising definitions,
  • establishing the contractual framework between the single allocation platform and market participants,
  • harmonising the use-it-or-sell-it provisions,
  • describing the types of long-term transmission rights, the nomination rules and the forward capacity allocation process,
  • harmonising financial requirements and settlement.

How does ACER contribute?

ACER ensures the decision on all-TSOs’ proposal is in line with the objectives of the FCA Regulation and fulfils all the legal obligations set out by its Article 51. 

ACER withdraws its decision defining the system operation regions

Image
High voltage tower
Intro News
The EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has withdrawn its decision of 29 June 2021 defining the system operation regions (SORs)

ACER withdraws its decision defining the system operation regions

What is it about?

The EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has withdrawn its decision of 29 June  2021 defining the system operation regions (SORs), which replaced its decision of 6 April 2020, by which ACER had amended and approved ENTSO-E’s proposal of 6 January 2020 for the definition of SORs.

The latest decision on the definition of SORs is currently subject to an appeal before the ACER Board of Appeal.

The withdrawal of the decision follows the finding by ACER that the principles of good administration (access to the file) were not sufficiently respected during the administrative procedure.

In the reopened proceedings for a new decision, ACER intends to focus on the part of the SOR definition subject to appeal, namely including the South-West Europe (SWE) Capacity Calculation Region (CCR) in the Central Europe SOR and not defining a separate SWE SOR.

The definition of the SORs represents the first step towards the establishment of regional coordination centres, which will ensure an enhanced institutional framework for a higher level of coordination between transmission system operators at regional level, as well as to enhanced system security and market efficiency.

Decision of 19 October 2021 (No 13/2021).

Decision of 29 June 2021 (No 08/2021).

Decision of 6 April 2020 (No 10/2020).

To access the Annexes go to individual decisions.

Second REMIT expert group on wholesale energy market trading

Second REMIT expert group on wholesale energy market trading

Scope of the group

Image
Expert Group talking, different people sitting around the table

This group was active from 2021-2023 with the goal of advising the Agency on on REMIT policy matters, including compliance with the obligation on market participants to disclose inside information. The group also advised the Agency on other EU regulations impacting energy trading and market functioning regulation on energy markets, including financial market regulation and finally, on the REMIT Regulation more broadly in order to develop proposals for any future review.​

The REMIT expert group was composed of the following members (in alphabetical order):

  • Mr Aviv Handler
  • Mr Bernhard Walter
  • Ms Camilla Berg
  • Mr Cosimo Compidoglio
  • Ms Giulia Migueles-Pereyra
  • Mr Karl-Peter Horstmann
  • Ms Ksenia Poplavskaya
  • Mr Matti Sohlman
  • Ms Nadja Keranen
  • Mr Piotr Krawczak
  • Mr Simon Dides
  • Mr Nikolaj Nabo Andersen (observer for ENTSO-E)
  • Mr Mark Csete (observer for ENTSO-E)
  • Ms Kathrine Stannov (observer for ENTSOG)
  • Ms Viktoria Medvedeva-Tšernobrivaja (observer for ENTSOG)
  • Ms Violeta Sliskovic

Call for experts: ACER expert group on demand side flexibility

Image
acer image
Intro News
ACER launches today a call for a new consultative expert group on demand side flexibility.

Call for experts: ACER expert group on demand side flexibility

What is it about?

The EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) launches today a call for a new consultative expert group on demand side flexibility. The group will advise the Agency on topics related to the Regulation on the internal market for electricity and specifically on demand side flexibility. 

The scope of the Expert Group

The group will focus on providing advice on demand side flexibility subjects, including rules on aggregation, energy storage and other provisions. In providing advice, experts can explore various topics such as product(s) provided by distributed energy resources to Transmission System Operators and/or Distribution System Operators, investigating the coordination options between them, as well as distributed energy resources’ access to wholesale markets.

The group may also be called on to provide advice for amendments to existing network codes and guidelines, as well as for developing new framework guidelines, or to submit opinions on any other issue related to ACER’s tasks in the demand side flexibility domain.

Would you like to find out more?

More information on the application process, the Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure can be found in the Open Letter​.

Apply by Monday 26th July 2021.

System Operation

System Operation

The SO Regulation

The SO Regulation provides the rules and standards to ensure the required level of operational security, frequency, quality and efficient use of the interconnected system and resources. The SO Regulation entered into force on 14 September 2017. ​

Click here for information on the incident on the power system separation of Iberia from Continental Europe on 24 July 2021.

Click here for in​​​​​formation on the continental Europe electricity system separation (​8th January 2021) incident.​​

Click here for information on the incident in the Polish power system on 17 May 2021.

System Operation

The core elements

Image
Electricity small

The SO Regulation applies to significant grid users that are further characterised as (new or existing):

  • power generating modules classified as type B, C and D

  • transmission connected demand facilities

  • transmission connected closed distribution systems     

  • demand facilities, closed distribution systems and third parties in case they provide demand response directly to the TSO

  • high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems, as well as,

  • providers of redispatching of power generating modules or demand facilities by means of aggregation and providers of active power reserve.

The network code provides a minimum degree of harmonisation and leaves certain details to further implementation p​rocedures at regional level. This also applies to terms and conditions, as well as to methodologies, in connection to:

  • key organisational requirements, roles and responsibilities related to data exchange and operational security

  • methodology for building the common grid models

  • methodology for coordinating operational security analysis.​​

System Operation

Terms, conditions and methodologies

The SO Regulation defines obligations for TSOs, regulatory authorities and ACER on the development and approval of terms and conditions and methodologies, as well as describing their adoption process. These rules contribute to ensuring security, facilitating the establishment and functioning of the Union's internal electricity market and the integration of renewable energy sources, as well as allowing a more efficient usage of the network and increasing competition for the benefit of consumers.

Terms and conditions and methodologies can be subject to the approval of:

  • All regulatory authorities

  • Regulatory authorities of a specific region

  • Individually at the Member states' level

The TSOs' proposal should be consulted upon and submitted to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval. The proposal should contain a timescale for implementation and expected impact on the Regulation's objectives.

The NRAs involved should take decisions within six months after receiving the proposal. In case of disagreement, the regulatory authorities can request an amendment, allowing TSOs two more months for adjustments and additional two months for the regulatory authorities to approve the revised proposal. If the NRAs do not reach a unanimous agreement, or if they jointly request so, ACER can adopt a decision within six months from the referral.

Once the terms and conditions or methodologies are adopted, they can be amended after the request of the relevant TSO or NRA. In this case, the proposals for adjustments should be submitted for consultation and undergo a new approval procedure.

The implementation tabl​e​ provides more details on the latest updates.

 

Methodology for Coordinating Operational Security Analysis (CSAM)

The Coordinating Operational Security Analysis Methodology (CSAM) guarantees the safe execution of operational activities within the European Union's power system by outlining provisions and requirements for all Transmission System Operators (TSOs) and Regional Coordination Centres (RCCs) to:

  • Facilitate effective coordination of system operation and operational planning.
  • Ensure transparency and reliability of information regarding transmission system operation.
  • Promote efficient operation of the electricity transmission system across the Union.

Approved CSAM

First ACER Decision

On 19 June 2019 ACER adopted the first Decision No 07/2019 on CSAM. This Decision took into consideration inputs received in an ACER public consultation (which ran from 25 January until 18 February 2019).

This Decision allowed 18 months (i.e. until 18 December 2020) for TSOs to develop detailed rules to:

  • Include remedial actions in individual grid models (Article 21).
  • Coordinate cross-border relevant network elements (XNEs) and remedial actions (XRAs) in overlapping zones (Article 27).
  • Share costs for XNEs and XRAs in overlapping zones (Inter-CCR) (Article 27).

In January 2023, ACER published a Corrigendum to correct a typographical error in Annex I of Decision No 07/2019.

Amendments to CSAM

First amendment: Following a public consultation (in summer 2020) organised by ENTSO-E (on behalf of all TSOs), ENTSO-E submitted a proposal to ACER to amend the CSAM in December 2020. In June 2021, with its Decision  No 07/2021, ACER amended the CSAM.

Second amendment: In early summer 2023, ENTSO-E (on behalf of all TSOs) ran a public consultation to consult on new amendments to CSAM. In November 2023, ENTSO-E submitted to ACER its proposal to amend the methodology.

ACER amended the CSAM on 13 May 2024 with its Decision No 07/2024.

 

Methodology for assessing the relevance of assets for outage coordination​

All TSOs must develop a proposal for a methodology at least per synchronous area, evaluating the relevance of outage coordination's assets (RAOCM) and submit it to all the regulatory authorities for approval and to ACER for information.

Action 1: In September 2018, all TSOs submitted the proposal for RAOCM to all the regulatory authorities and to ACER.

Action 2: In December 2018, all regulatory authorities requested ACER to adopt a decision on the Proposal.

Action 3: From 25 January to 18 February 2019 ACER conducted a formal public consultation in order to obtain a wider view from stakeholders.

Action 4: In Spring 2019, ACER engaged with TSOs and NRAs and informed them about the decision.

Action 5: In June 2019, ACER adopted a decision on the proposal for RAOCM.

The RAOCM is expected to be implemented within three months after ACER's decision.

Related documents

Approved proposal for coordinating operational security analysis

 

Methodology for regional operational security coordination - CORE Region​

All CORE TSOs must develop a proposal for a methodology for regional operational security coordination (ROSC) and submit it to all CORE regulatory authorities for approval. The methodology should aim at the regional standardisation of operational security analysis for Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia (the CORE region).

Action 1: In December 2019, all CORE TSOs submitted the proposal for the ROSC to all regulatory authorities.

Action 2: In June 2020, all CORE regulatory authorities requested ACER to adopt a decision on the proposal.

Action 3: In September 2020, ACER conducted a formal public consultation in order to obtain a wider view from stakeholders.

Action 4: From July to October 2020, ACER engaged with TSOs and NRAs and informed them about the decision.

Action 5: In December 2020, ACER adopted a decision on the Methodology for Regional Operational Security Coordination for the Core Capacity Calculation Region.

The ROSC is expected to be implemented in two steps. Find more details on these steps within the approved methodology.

Related documents

Approved Core ROSC

CORE TSOs' proposal

Explanatory document

RAs letter for referral ​​

Core ROSC​ Non-Paper​​

 

Methodology for regional operational security coordination - SEE Region

All SEE TSOs must develop a proposal for a methodology for regional operational security coordination (ROSC) and submit it to all SEE regulatory authorities for approval. The methodology should aim at the regional standardisation of operational security analysis for Bulgaria, Greece and Romania (the SEE region).

Action 1: In December 2019, all SEE TSOs submitted the proposal for the ROSC to all regulatory authorities.

Action 2: In October 2020, all SEE regulatory authorities requested ACER to adopt a decision on the proposal.

Action 3: In October 2020, ACER engaged with TSOs and NRAs and informed them about the decision.

Action 4: In December 2020, ACER adopted a decision on the Methodology for Regional Operational Security Coordination for the SEE Capacity Calculation Region.

The ROSC is expected to be implemented in two steps. Find more details on these steps within the approved methodology.

Related documents 

Approved SEE ROSC

SEE TSOs' proposal

RAs letter for referral

RAs Non​- Paper

ACER adopted a Decision on the amendments to the European methodology for coordinated security analysis

Image
Discussing electricity
Intro News
Following close cooperation and consultation with TSOs and NRAs ahead of its adoption, ACER’s Decision revised and approved the amendments proposed by TSOs and set out the amended CSAM.

ACER adopted a Decision on the amendments to the European methodology for coordinated security analysis

What is it about?

The European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) adopted a Decision on the amendments to the pan-European methodology for coordinated security analysis.

In December 2020, ENTSO-E, on behalf of all TSOs, submitted amendments to the existing coordinated security analysis methodology (CSAM). These amendments concerned the inclusion of remedial actions in individual grid models, the coordination and cost sharing of cross-border relevant network elements, as well as of cross-border remedial actions in overlapping zones (Inter-CCR).

Following close cooperation and consultation with TSOs and NRAs ahead of its adoption, ACER’s Decision revised and approved the amendments proposed by TSOs and set out the amended CSAM, pursuant to Article 75 of the SO Regulation.

Access the Decision.

ACER Greening Action Plan

ACER Greening Action Plan

ACER pledges to reduce its carbon footprint with its Greening Action Plan (2021-2022)

Image
ACER Greening Action Plan, infographics, steps

With the adoption of its Greening Action Plan 2021-2022, ACER pledges to reduce its own carbon footprint as an organisation.

ACER’s desire to become greener and more digital as an organisation is not surprising for an EU Agency that plays such a pivotal role in the delivery of Europe’s ambition to be climate neutral by 2050.

Decarbonising the energy sector is a core pillar of the European Green Deal. Europe’s decarbonisation goals relies on integrated European energy markets. This lies at the heart of ACER’s work. Safe and sustainable energy is in turn a key enabler of a competitive and climate-neutral EU economy.

What’s in the ACER Greening Action Plan 2021-2022?

ACER has adopted its first Greening Action Plan identifying 17 concrete actions that aim to reduce the Agency’s carbon footprint in the course of 2021 and 2022, with a strong cross-departmental effort.

This commitment shows ACER’s readiness to implement concrete greening actions, and to support the efforts of its staff and members embracing innovation and sustainable ways of working.

ACER actions fall into six thematic action domains, inspired by the European Commission’s Feasibility and Scoping Study for the Commission to Become Climate Neutral by 2030:

  • Design sustainable buildings and working space;
  • Optimise energy consumption and systems for buildings;
  • Reconsider air travel and promote sustainable travel modes;
  • Reduce commuting emissions for transport and mobility;
  • Reduce GreenHouse Gas (GHG) emissions from purchase and consumption;
  • Manage and communicate for other sources of emissions.

The Agency was invited by its Administrative Board to prepare its first Greening Action Plan for 2021-2022.

ACER’s Greening Action Plan details the current state of play as well as the planned actions of the Agency factoring in the available resources.

Read more on the ACER Greening Action Plan (2021-2022).

ACER pledges to reduce its carbon footprint with its Greening Action Plan 2021-2022

Image
ACER Greening Action Plan, infographics, steps
Intro News
With the adoption of its Greening Action Plan 2021-2022, ACER pledges to reduce its own carbon footprint as an organisation.

ACER pledges to reduce its carbon footprint with its Greening Action Plan 2021-2022

Decarbonising the energy sector is a core pillar of the European Green Deal

Image
ACER Greening Action Plan, steps

With the adoption of its Greening Action Plan 2021-2022, ACER pledges to reduce its own carbon footprint as an organisation.

ACER’s desire to become greener and more digital as an organisation is not surprising for an EU Agency that plays such a pivotal role in the delivery of Europe’s ambition to be climate neutral by 2050.

Decarbonising the energy sector is a core pillar of the European Green Deal. Europe’s decarbonisation goals relies on integrated European energy markets. This lies at the heart of ACER’s work. Safe and sustainable energy is in turn a key enabler of a competitive and climate-neutral EU economy.

What’s in the ACER Greening Action Plan 2021-2022?

ACER has adopted its first Greening Action Plan identifying 17 concrete actions that aim to reduce the Agency’s carbon footprint in the course of 2021 and 2022, with a strong cross-departmental effort.

This commitment shows ACER’s readiness to implement concrete greening actions, and to support the efforts of its staff and members embracing innovation and sustainable ways of working.

ACER actions fall into six thematic action domains, inspired by the European Commission’s Feasibility and Scoping Study for the Commission to Become Climate Neutral by 2030:

  • Design sustainable buildings and working space;
  • Optimise energy consumption and systems for buildings;
  • Reconsider air travel and promote sustainable travel modes;
  • Reduce commuting emissions for transport and mobility;
  • Reduce GreenHouse Gas (GHG) emissions from purchase and consumption;
  • Manage and communicate for other sources of emissions.

The Agency was invited by its Administrative Board to prepare its first Greening Action Plan for 2021-2022. ACER’s Greening Action Plan details the current state of play as well as the planned actions of the Agency factoring in the available resources.

Read the ACER Greening Action Plan (2021-2022).

Find out more on how ACER contributes to the European Green Deal.